No, I called you nothing...what an imagination;) That imagination extends to your summation of the review. He in NO way attacks Koonin's character. This is an example of a strawman argument, asserting something that doesn't exist (character attack) as a substitute for arguing the issue in question. Further confirmation bias at work hypothesizing over "some issues" rather than addressing the logical flaws that were claimed. Nor do you know whether the author is a "climate alarmist" just another strawman. So far there have been no character attacks in our discussion, maybe you can enlighten me;)