Not sure what part of my comment if any, you are responding to. I certainly didn't recommend adopting an Inuit style diet, I just pointed out that it was possible. Obviously the reverse isn't true; healthy fats and proteins are, as they say in NASA and the military, "mission critical", while carbs are far less so. When you say that carbs "are the best for burning energy" that statement should come with a huge caveat. Healthy whole and unrefined sources of carbs are definitely important to health, refined or processed carbs are often toxic and disease promoting, as evidenced by the state of health in our country.

I really like the revised pyramid you posted above, which makes more clear the healthy ways of eating than the old government model. Given that your original article seems to be targeted at the "nutrition for dummies" slice of readers you should consider working it in.

When I first learned about the connection between eating and health (the late 60's) the medical community, including nutritionists, scoffed at our focus on whole, unprocessed foods. Even in the late 90's when my mom had her first and very scary episode of CHF she carefully followed medical advice to eat low fat, advice that probably exacerbated her disease. Choosing "low fat" labeled foods she almost certainly ate too much sugar and processed foods, heart damaging, and avoided heart health fats. Food for thought as they say;)