Not sure what you are trying to say in your first sentence. Neither your nor my opinion on the presence of psychopathy is very relevant, neither of us is a psychologist or psychiatrist. Possibly you might study a little about psychological disorders, so that you understand that they have few, if any organic markers and can be difficult to definitively diagnose.

Equality is not a moral status, it is a legal status.

The preamble to the Declaration does not mention God, you merely assume that the creator, whatever its true nature, IS God, an assumption utterly without evidentiary support. You insert in parentheses YOUR interpretation of the meaning of this passage, did the author share your interpretation he could easily have included it. He did not.

You may see morality as the standard of perfection, there's no evidence that the framers did.

Harm is NOT a moral judgement, it is a physical and quantifiable one. When a plaintiff sues in a tort claim they must document actual and real harm, and offense to their moral sense will not count in court as actual harm...settled law.

The Court needed no testimony on moral considerations, it could document ACTUAL harm to the plaintiffs from the denial to them of protections of law, lost partner benefits, quantifiable effects of the laws being challenged and eventually overturned.

You avoid the issue here. The moral standards that the Catholic and Evangelical churches teach and enforce are valid...to THEM. They are not valid to other citizens and may not be enforced upon them by force of law. This is the difference between moral standards and legal standards, which need to stay separated if the rights of all are to be protected. All have the right to teach and promote their particular moral standards, NONE have the right to force them on others.