This reads like a college bull session. I'm not knocking college bull sessions, I imagine they were great fun for those privileged to participate, but by necessity they veer far from reality.

All the philosophizing in the world, be it Austrian or Keynesian or Rosicrucian can reach no farther than its assumptions, or as the author terms them its, "a-priori truths", and these both unprovable and as the constructs of the human intellect, flawed and not true to life.

It seems fitting then that the author looks to Bitcoin, which draws attention not through any particularly useful function but through the philosophical beliefs of its proponents and the greed of speculators.

Bitcoin in its function is a flea riding the back of a bull...it does better when the bull is doing better and does damned little on its own. Its protocol guarantees that it can never function as more than a bit player in the larger economies of the world, and as a dependent riding on the economic systems it purports to despise and intends to replace, its success would also be its demise.