When exactly, and for what? There was of course no need to "fight back attempts to overturn Roe", It was settled precedent and ONLY the courts could protect it. What makes you think that the current court wouldn't just toss out as unconstitutional such a law. Depend on it, one of their next targets is a personhood from conception ruling. You, and of course Elizabeth seem to love to ignore the politics involved in every legislative proposal, and yet the most salient feature about those proposals is whether there are the votes to pass them and the right person in the Oval to sign them. Do just the minimum of research. I realize that doing so is boring and too often doesn't yield the results you want. If you find a congress in the last 40 years that would have codified Roe you let me know;)